CDP reporting continues to play a critical role in how companies demonstrate environmental performance to investors, customers, and global supply chains. While the fundamentals of CDP disclosure remain familiar, expectations around quality, consistency, and year-on-year improvement have increased significantly.
For companies CDP is no longer just a voluntary sustainability exercise. It has become a commercial and reputational requirement, driven by multinational customers, investor expectations, and tightening ESG scrutiny across global markets.
This article focuses on why CDP reporting still matters, what has changed, and why maintaining or improving a CDP score requires continuous effort, not a one-off submission.
CDP remains one of the most widely used environmental disclosure platforms globally. Thousands of investors, lenders, and procurement teams rely on CDP data to assess environmental risk, resilience, and long-term value creation.
CDP reporting is important because it:
Increasingly, companies are not asked whether they disclose to CDP, but how strong their score is and whether it is improving.
One of the biggest misconceptions is that CDP reporting is static. In reality, the bar is raised almost every year.
Key changes companies are experiencing include:
For companies that previously scored well, this means standing still can result in a lower score, even if internal activities have not changed.
A common challenge we see is companies assuming that once they reach a certain CDP score, it can be maintained with minimal effort.
In practice, CDP scoring is relative and progressive. Scores can slip because:
To maintain or improve a CDP score, companies must continuously develop internal processes, refine governance, and strengthen data management.
CDP rewards demonstrated progress, not intention.
A well-managed CDP disclosure delivers tangible business benefits, particularly for companies operating in export-driven or investor-facing markets.
Key advantages include:
For suppliers, CDP performance increasingly influences who stays on preferred supplier lists and who does not.
CDP participation continues to grow year on year.
This growth means that non-disclosure or weak disclosure stands out more than ever.
While the detailed process is covered in our dedicated CDP guide, all CDP disclosures are built around a consistent set of principles:
Strong CDP disclosures are evidence-led, structured, and aligned with recognised frameworks.
Globally, CDP disclosure are rarely driven by internal ambition alone.
Most companies disclose because:
Companies that prepare early and approach CDP strategically are far better positioned than those reacting under time pressure.
For organisations that have already disclosed, improvement usually starts with:
For first-time reporters, the focus is on building a credible foundation rather than chasing scores prematurely.
CDP reporting has evolved from a voluntary disclosure into an ongoing performance benchmark.
Maintaining or improving a CDP score requires:
Whether your organisation is disclosing for the first time or looking to strengthen an existing score, the right guidance can turn CDP from a compliance burden into a strategic advantage.

